 |
   |
|
| |
|
|
| Subject |
no way, I don't have grass is greener syndrome |
|
| |
|
|
| Posted by |
Altered BeaZTT on October 05, 2000 at 6:09 PM |
|
| |
This message has been viewed 11 times. |
|
| |
|
|
| In Reply To |
According to my count most would NOT switch. :P (n/m) posted by John Y(Houston) on October 05, 2000 at 05:36 PM |
|
| |
|
|
| Message |
me, Zo and alot of the So.Cal. guys are so confused by this. I don't know anyone that really thinks the Supra is better looking than the Z.... I don't know anyone that honestly believes it's more dependable. I know of alot of Z's running low 12's in the ~$2K range safely. Every BPU Supra I've seen at Pomona and other tracks(and I've seen alot) runs low 13's to low 14's. The cars are so very close and comparable by performance and anyone that says otherwise don't get out enough. I've been to the So. Cal tracks quit a bit this year and seen many Z's and Supra's moderatly modded (stock turbos and NOS free). I've actually seen the Z's seem to do a little better down the strip with comparative mods. This is coming from a guy who had never been to the track @ stageIII till this last Jan. I at that point was thinking Supras must be bad ass too from what I'd heard. I was looking at them for sale. I was thinking they're not that pretty, but fast cars. Well, after being at the track, I was sure as hell proved wrong from what I saw. They weren't slow by any means, but I swear if you could make them look like a Z on the outside, never open their hoods, paint them with magical pink paint, I wouldn't think the pink Z's were running any better times than the other Z's by any means.
|
|
| |
|
|
| Follow Ups |
|
|
| |
|
|
Post a
Followup |
You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
